Support MycoNote →

MycoNote

How to tell Sulphur knight from Sulphur tuft

Sulphur tuft is poisonous

Sulphur knight and Sulphur tuft look alike, so they're easy to mix up — but Sulphur knight is inedible, while Sulphur tuft is poisonous. The main visible difference: substrate: Sulphur knight — soil, leaf litter, Sulphur tuft — dead wood. The mushrooms also differ in the following features: smell. If you have even the slightest doubt, leave the mushroom be.

Not sure? Identify by photo

Side by side

Sulphur knightSulphur tuft
Comparison of characteristics: Sulphur knight and Sulphur tuft
SeasonSulphur knight: Summer, AutumnSulphur tuft: Spring, Summer, Autumn
SizeSulphur knight: Small (up to 5 cm), Medium (5–15 cm)Sulphur tuft: Small (up to 5 cm)
Cap colourSulphur knight: Yellow, Pale yellow, OliveSulphur tuft: Yellow, Olive
Cap shapeSulphur knight: Convex, Flat, UmbonateSulphur tuft: Convex, Flat
Cap surfaceSulphur knight: Dry, Velvety, SmoothSulphur tuft: Smooth
TasteSulphur knight: Bitter, Mealy tasteSulphur tuft: Bitter
SmellSulphur knight: Unpleasant, ChemicalSulphur tuft: Odourless
StemSulphur knight: CentralSulphur tuft: Central, Hollow
SubstrateSulphur knight: Soil, Leaf litterSulphur tuft: Dead wood
Nutrition typeSulphur knight: MycorrhizalSulphur tuft: Saprotroph
Partner treesSulphur knight: Oak, Beech, Pine, Spruce, FirSulphur tuft: Oak, Birch, Pine, Spruce
Growth habitSulphur knight: Solitary, In groupsSulphur tuft: In clusters from one base

Same in both: edibility class, use, flesh colour change, hymenophore.

When and where they meet

Together: August–November

Their seasons overlap: August–November. At that time you can find both in the same woods. Shared habitats: deciduous forest, mixed forest, conifer forest.

Sulphur knight

Fruiting season

August – November

Sulphur tuft

Fruiting season

May – December

What they look like

Cap, Hymenophore, Stem, Flesh, Smell

Cap

Sulphur knight

The cap is 3–8 cm across. Young caps are hemispherical or convex, then flatten out with a wavy margin, often keeping a low umbo in the centre, occasionally with a slight dip.

It is sulphur yellow, developing rusty-brown fibres in the centre with age, sometimes with an olive or reddish tinge. Some specimens have a purplish-brown cap: these were once described as a separate species, Tricholoma bufonium, but DNA work shows they are a form of the same species. The surface is dry, matt and slightly velvety, never slimy and without obvious scales.

Sulphur tuft

The cap is 2–7 cm across, convex or hemispherical when young, then flattening. It's sulphur yellow or egg-yolk yellow, often orange-brown in the centre, with a smooth, moist surface and no scales. The margin is uneven and, in young mushrooms, joined to the stem by a cobwebby veil.

Hymenophore

Sulphur knight

The gills are sulphur yellow, broad, thick and widely spaced, notched where they meet the stem, with shorter gills in between and a slightly uneven edge. These distant, thick gills are what set it apart from the yellow knight, whose gills are crowded and thin.

The spore print is white. A purple-brown print, with gills that turn greenish and then dark, means you are looking at a sulphur tuft.

Sulphur tuft

The gills are crowded, yellow or yellow-green at first, then darkening to grey-green or brownish olive. This is the key feature that sets it apart from the edible honey fungus, whose gills are whitish or cream. The spore print is purplish brown.

Stem

Sulphur knight

The stem is 3–10 cm tall and 0.5–1.8 cm thick, cylindrical and firm. It is bright yellow at the top and sulphur yellow lower down, with reddish or brownish lengthwise fibres, and the base turns brownish in older specimens, sometimes with white down at the very bottom.

There is no ring, no veil remnants and no volva.

Sulphur tuft

The stem is thin, 4–10 cm tall and 0.4–0.8 cm thick, yellowish above and brownish or rusty below, and fibrous. There's no ring, or only a faint fibrous one that soon disappears. True honey fungus usually has a membranous ring, but it can be torn off, so the ring alone won't tell them apart: look at the gill colour first.

Flesh

Sulphur knight

The flesh is sulphur yellow, sometimes greenish, all the way through the cap and stem, and doesn't change colour when broken. The taste is unpleasant, mealy and often bitter.

Sulphur tuft

The flesh is yellowish, thin and bitter, very bitter when raw. But cooking removes the bitterness while the toxins remain, so in a finished dish the mushroom won't give itself away.

Smell

Sulphur knight

The smell is very strong and unpleasant: coal tar, acetylene, old-fashioned coal gas, and to some people hydrogen sulphide. It comes from skatole, which in weaker doses can even seem floral, like jasmine or hyacinth. It is strongest on a freshly broken surface.

A paler form with only a faint smell does exist, so a mushroom that is yellow throughout with thick, widely spaced gills but little smell is still not necessarily a yellow knight. Always look at all the features together.

Sulphur tuft

The smell is mushroomy but indistinct, so you can't tell it from honey fungus by smell.

Related comparisons

Sources · 14

  • [1]Атлас грибів України, Зеров Д.К. (1979)
  • [2]GBIF
  • [3]Index Fungorum
  • [4]iNaturalist Ukraine
  • [5]First Nature, Pat O'Reilly
  • [6]Wikipedia (English)
  • [7]Википедия (русская)
  • [8]Prylutskyi O. et al. Reference-based checklist of gilled Agaricales from Ukraine. Biodiversity Data Journal, 2023, 11: e99101, Prylutskyi O. et al. (2023)
  • [9]Wikipedia (de): Gemeiner Schwefel-Ritterling
  • [10]Naturalis: Tricholoma sulphureum (Nederlands Soortenregister)
  • [11]Comandini O., Haug I., Rinaldi A.C., Kuyper T.W. Uniting Tricholoma sulphureum and T. bufonium. Mycological Research, 2004, 108(10): 1162–1171, Comandini O., Haug I., Rinaldi A.C., Kuyper T.W. (2004)
  • [12]Diaz J.H. Syndromic diagnosis and management of confirmed mushroom poisonings. Critical Care Medicine, 2005, 33(2): 427–436, Diaz J.H. (2005)
  • [13]Bedry R. et al. Wild-mushroom intoxication as a cause of rhabdomyolysis. New England Journal of Medicine, 2001, 345(11): 798–802, Bedry R. et al. (2001)
  • [14]Chodorowski Z., Waldman W., Sein Anand J. Acute poisoning with Tricholoma equestre. Przegląd Lekarski, 2002, 59(4–5): 386–387, Chodorowski Z., Waldman W., Sein Anand J. (2002)